Substratum preferences of Ascidians in Natural and Artificial Reef Environment, Andaman and Nicobar Islands

Authors

  • Zoological Survey of India, Prani Vigyan Bhawan, M – Block, New Alipore, Kolkata – 700053, West Bengal
  • Zoological Survey of India, Prani Vigyan Bhawan, M – Block, New Alipore, Kolkata – 700053, West Bengal

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26515/rzsi/v123/i2S/2023/172599

Keywords:

Biofouling, Substrate specificity, Natural reef, Artificial reef, Ascidians

Abstract

Ascidians are one of the significant bio-fouling organisms causes great economic loss, as they grow on offshore shellfish and finfish culture system, ship hulls, pontoons, jetties, buoys etc. This study carried out to estimate the fouling preferences of ascidians in variation with depth, season, and substrate at Pongibalu (natural reef) (11°30.958’N; 92°39.201’E) and North Bay (artificial reef) (11°43.006’N; 92°45.465’E) of Andaman and Nicobar Islands. Panels (concrete, glass, ceramic and metal) of 30 X 20 cm2 were placed at the depth of 10 m and 20 m from January 2015 to December 2015 by SCUBA diving. The data collection was made in every four months interval. Altogether 35 species of ascidians belonging to five families were settled on the panels including 12 species under the family Didemnidae. A total of 29 species of ascidians were recorded from Pongibalu whereas, only nine species were recorded from the North Bay during the study period. It is interesting to note that, Pyura lanka was found on the settlement panels only, instead of reef areas of Pongibalu; similarly, Symplegma brakenhielmi and Symplegma rubra were observed on the panels at North Bay although they were not observed in the reef areas of North Bay during the study period. Both P. lanka and S. brakenhielmi is considered as cryptogenic in nature and status of S. rubra is yet to be established. Among four types of settlement panels, concrete and ceramic panels showed significant coverage of ascidian settlement at both experimental stations. It was observed during the study that the panels of natural reef area showed the higher diversity, species richness, lesser dominance, and lesser coverage. Whereas, panels of artificial reef areas showed lesser diversity and species richness, and higher dominance (90.20%) of three species coverage which indicates an early sign of species invasion.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2023-07-01

How to Cite

Mondal, J., & Raghunathan, C. (2023). Substratum preferences of Ascidians in Natural and Artificial Reef Environment, Andaman and Nicobar Islands. Records of the Zoological Survey of India, 123(2S), 707–716. https://doi.org/10.26515/rzsi/v123/i2S/2023/172599

References

Bae. S., Ubagan, M.D., Shin, S. and Kim, D.G. 2022. Comparison of Recruitment Patterns of Sessile Marine Invertebrates According to Substrate Characteristics. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(3):1083.

Bailey-Brock, J.H. 1989. Fouling community development on an artificial reef in Hawaiian waters. Bulletin of Marine Science, 44: 580-591.

Bowden, D.A., Clarke, A., Peck, L.S. and Barnes, D.K.A. 2006. Atlantic sessile marine bentos: colonization and growth on artificial substrata over three years. Marine Ecology Progress series, 316: 1-16.

Brown, C.J. 2005. Epifaunal colonization of the Loch Linnhe artificial reef: Influence of substratum on epifaunal assemblage in the northern Gulf of Mexico. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 225: 107-121.

Brown, K.M. and Swearingen, D.C. 1998. Effects of seasonality, length of immersion, locality and predation on an intertidal fouling assemblage in the northern Gulf of Mexico. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 225: 107-121.

Bulleri, F. and Airoldi, L. 2005. Artificial marine structures facilitate the spread of nonindigenous green alga, Codium fragile ssp. Tomentosoides, in the north Adriatic Sea. Journal of Applied Ecology, 42: 1063-1072.

Cahill, P., Heasman, K., Jeffs, A., Kuhajek, J. and Mountfort, D. 2012. Preventing ascidian fouling in aquaculture: screening selected allelochemicals for anti-metamorphic properties in ascidian larvae. Biofouling, 28 (1): 39-49.

Cheng, J., Li, S., Li, X. et al. 2022. Molecular functional analyses of larval adhesion in a highly fouling invasive model ascidian. Marine Biology, 169: 120.

Giangrande, A., Lezzi, M., Pasqua, M.D., Pierri, C., Longo, C. and Gravina, M.F. 2020. Two cases study of fouling colonization patterns in the Mediterranean Sea in the perspective of integrated aquaculture systems. Aquaculture Reports, 18: 100455.

Goodbody, I. 2003. The Ascidian fauna of Port Royal, Jamaica I. Harbor and Mangrove dwelling species. Bulletin of Marine Science, 73 (2): 457-476.

Hatcher, A.M. 1998. Epibenthic colonization patterns on the slabs of stabilized coal-waste in Pool Bay, UK. Hydrobiologia, 367: 153-162.

Holt, R. and Cordingley, A. 2011. Eradication of the non-native carpet ascidian (sea squirt) Didemnum vexillum in Holyhead Harbour: Progress, methods and results to spring 2011. CCW Marine Monitoring Report No. 90.

Jaffarali, A., Tamilselvi, M. and Sivakumar, V. 2014. Non-indigenous Ascidians in V.O. Chidambaram Port, Thoothukudi, India. Indian Journal of Geo-Marine Sciences, 43 (11): 2147-2157.

Knott, N.A., Underwood, A.J., Chapman, M.G. and Glasby, T.M. 2004. Epibiota on vertical and horizontal surfaces on natural reefs and on artificial structures. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 84: 1117-1130.

Kott, P. 1985. The Australian Ascidiacea, Part 1, Phlebobranchia and Stolidobranchia. Memoirs of Queensland Museum, 23: 1-438.

Kott, P. 1990. The Australian Ascidiacea. Part 2. Aplousobranchia (1). Memoirs of Queensland Museum, 29(1): 1-266.

Kott, P. 2001. The Australian Ascidiacea, Part 4, Aplousobranhia (3), Didemnidae. Memoirs of Queensland Museum, 47(1): 1-410. Lambert, C.C. and Lambert, G. 2003. Persistence and differential distribution of nonindigenous ascidians in harbours of the Southern California Bight. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 259: 145-161.

Lambert, G. 2002. Nonindigenous Ascidians in tropical Waters. Pacific Science, 56(3): 291-298.

Lambert, G. 2005. Ecology and natural history of the protochordates. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 83: 34-50.

Meenakshi, V.K. 2010. Indian Ascidians – Potential Candidate for Research – A Review. Indian Journal of Biotechnology, 1(Special Issue): 29-33.

Micael, J., Ramos-Esplá, A.A., Rodrigues, P. and Gíslason, S. 2022. Recent spread of non-indigenous ascidians (Chordata: Tunicata) in Icelandic harbours. Marine Biology Research, 18(9-10): 566-576. DOI: 10.1080/17451000.2023.2176882

Molnar, J.L., Gamboa, R.L., Ravenga C and Spalding, M.D. 2008. Assessing the global threat of invasive species to marine biodiversity. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 6(9):485-92.

Monniot, F. and Monniot, C. 2001 Ascidians from the tropical western Pacific. Zoosystema, 23 (2): 201-383.

Murugan, A. and Ramasamy, M.S. 2003. Biofouling deterrent activity of natural product from ascidian, Distplia nathensis [Chordata]. Indian Journal of Marine Sciences, 32(2): 162-164.

Palanisamy, S.K., Thomas, O.P. and McCormack, G.P. 2018. Bio-invasive ascidians in Ireland: A threat for the shellfish industry but also a source of high added value products. Bioengineered, 9(1): 55-60. doi: 10.1080/21655979.2017.1392421.

Perkol-Finkel, S. and Benayahu, Y. 2005. Recruitment of benthic organisms onto a planned articial reef: shifts in community structure one decade post deployment. Marine Environmental Research, 59: 79-99.

Perkol-Finkel, S. and Benayahu, Y. 2007. Differential recruitment of benthic communities on neighbouring artificial and natural reefs. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 340: 25-39.

Perkol-Finkel, S., Miloh, T., Zilman G., Sella, I. and Benayahu, Y. 2006. Floating and fixed artificial reefs: the effect of benthic substratum motion on benthic communities. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 317: 9-20.

Qiu, J.W., Thiyagarajan, V., Leung, A.W.Y. and Qian, P.Y. 2003. Development of marine subtidal epibiotic in Hong Kong: implications for deployment of artificial reefs. Biofouling, 19: 37-46.

Renganathan, T.K. and Monniot, F. 1984. Additions to the ascidian fauna of India. Bulletin du Muséum national d’histoire naturelle, Paris, 4(A)2: 257-262.

Rocha, R.M., Kremer, L.P., Bapista, M.S. and Matri, R. 2009. Bivalve cultures provide habitat for exotic tunicates in southern Brazil. Aquatic Invasion, 4(1): 195-205.

Sahu, G., Achary, M.S., Satpathy, K.K., Mohanty, A.K., Biswas, S. and Prasad, M.V.R. 2011. Studies on the settlement and succession of macrofouling organisms in the Kalpakkam coastal waters, southeast coast of India. Indian Journal of Geo- Marine Sciences, 40(6): 747-761.

Shenkar, N. 2008. Ecological aspects of the ascidian community along the Israeli coasts. PhD Thesis. Tel-Aviv University, Israel. 1-122. Swami, B.S. and Chhapgar, B.F. 2002. Settlement pattern of Ascidians in harbour waters of Mumbai, west coast of India. Indian Journal of Marine Sciences, 31(3): 207-212.

Swami, B.S., Udhayakumar, M. and Gaonkar, S.N. 2011. Biodiversity in fouling species at Karanja Jetty (Mumbai), west coast of India. Journal of Marine Biological Association, India, 53(2): 242-250.

Venkat, K., Anil, A.C., Khandeparker and Mokashe, S.S. 1995. Ecology of Ascidians in the macrofouling community of New Mangalore Port. Indian Journal of Marine Sciences, 21: 41-43.

Watson, D.I. and Barnes, D.K.A. 2004. Temporal and spatial components of variability in benthic recruitment, a 5-year temprerate example. Marine Biology, 145: 201-214.

Wendt, P.H., Knott, D.M. and Van Dolah, R.H., 1989. Community structure of the sessile biota on five srtificial reefs of different ages. Bulletin of Marine Science, 44: 1106-1122.