Distinction of two featherback species (Osteoglossiformes: Notopteridae) in India based on scale structure

Authors

  • Yogesh Kumar Rawal
     Department of Zoology, Fish and Fisheries Laboratory, Panjab University, Chandigarh – 160014
  • Oshin Dhillon
     Department of Zoology, Akal University, Talwandi Sabo, District Bathinda, Punjab – 151302
  • Inderpal Singh Sidhu
     Department of Zoology, SGGS College, Sector 26, Chandigarh – 160019

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26515/rzsi/v120/i3/2020/152790

Keywords:

Chitala, Lepidology, Morphometry, Notopterus, SEM, Taxonomy

Abstract

The fish species are identified primarily based on their morphological and meristic characters and of late, the molecular markers too have been used for differentiating between different genera and species. Scale morphology and structure has been established as a tool in fish taxonomy. The present investigation shows the utility of scale in distinguishing two featherback species occurring in India, Notopterus notopterus (Pallas) and Chitala chitala (Hamilton). Morphology and ultra structure (using SEM) of the scales of both the species were studied. The scales of N. notopterus are granulated with bead like structures in the focus, extending into the anterior part whereas the focus is smooth in C. chitala. Based on the length/ width ratio, the scales are relatively longer in N. notopterus than C. chitala. The lateral line is relatively short in C. chitala with rounded anterior end and trifurcated posterior end whereas it is longer in N. notopterus with elongated anterior opening and rounded posterior opening. Other distinguishing features which separate these two species include intercirculus distance and width of the radial canal. Therefore, the scale of the featherback species in India may be successfully employed in distinguishing them.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2020-09-06

How to Cite

Kumar Rawal, Y., Dhillon, O., & Singh Sidhu, I. (2020). Distinction of two featherback species (Osteoglossiformes: Notopteridae) in India based on scale structure. Records of the Zoological Survey of India, 120(3), 241–246. https://doi.org/10.26515/rzsi/v120/i3/2020/152790

Issue

Volume 120, Issue 3, 2020

Section

Articles
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

References

Capobianco, A. and Friedman, M. 2019. Vicariance and dispersal in southern hemisphere freshwater fish clades: A palaeontological perspective, Biol. Rev., 94: 662-699. https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12473. PMid: 30338909.

Chandra, K., Gopi, K.C., Rao, D.V., Valarmathi, K. and Alfred, J.R.B. (eds) 2017. Current status of freshwater faunal diversity in India, Zool. Surv. India, Kolkata: 1-624.

Chandra, K. and Sheela, S. 2019. Animal Discoveries 2018. New Species and New Records: 1-131. Published by the Director, Zool. Surv. India, Kolkata.

Hilton, E.J. and Lavoué, S. 2018. A review of the systematic biology of fossil and living bony-tongue fishes, Osteoglossomorpha (Actinopterygii: Teleostei) Neotrop. Ichthyol. 16: 1-35. https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-0224-20180031.

Hughes, D.R. 1981. Development and organization of the posterior field of Ctenoid scales in the Platycephalidae, Copeia, 1981(3): 596-606. https://doi.org/10.2307/1444564.

Jawad, L. A. 2005a. Comparative scale morphology of the scales of four teleost fishes from Sudan and Yeman, J. Nat. Hist., 29(25): 2643-2660. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222930500102801.

Jawad, L.A. 2005b. Comparative scale morphology and squamation pattern in triplefins (Pisces: Teleostei: Perciformes: Tripterygiida), Tuhinga, 16: 137-167.

Jayaram, K.C. 2012. The Freshwater Fishes of the Indian Region. 2nd Edition (corrected). Narendra Publishing House, Delhi, India: 1-616.

Johal, M.S. and Chadha, N. 2005. Scale structure of Barilius barila (Ham. 1822) as revealed by SEM. 29-34. In: (Ed. M.S. Johal). Proceedings of National Seminar ‘New Trends in Fishery Development in India’, 16-18 February 2005, Panjab University, Chandigarh.

Johal, M.S. and Dhiman, M. 2007. Ultrastructure of fish scales as a tool in fish identification up to species level of genus Puntius (Hamilton), Panjab University Res. J. Sci., 57: 73-81.

Johal, M.S., Rawal, Y.K., Kaur, A. and Kaur, A. 2014. Ultrastructure of the focus region of the regenerated cycloid scale of an exotic fish, Cyprinus carpio communis L. as a possible key to comprehensive understanding of populations, Curr. Sci., 106(5): 744-748.

Kaur, N. and Dua, A. 2004. Species specificity as evidenced by scanning electron microscopy of fish scales, Curr. Sci., 87(5): 692-96.

Lakra, W.S., Sarkar, U.K., Gopalakrishnan, A. and Kathirvelpandian, A. 2010. Threatened Freshwater Fishes of India, National Bureau of Fish Genetic Resources, Lucknow: 1-25.

Lal, K.K., Mandal, A., Singh, R.K., Punia, P., Kapoor, D., Chauhan, U.K., Singh, S. P. and Mohindra, V. 2006. Genetic divergence in two featherback fishes, Chitala chitala and Notopterus notopterus, J. Appl. Ichthyol., 22(2006): 369-373. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439- 0426.2006.00758.x.

Nelson, J.S., Grande T.C. and Wilson M.V.H. 2016. Fishes of the World (5th edition). John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, N.J.: v-xli + 1-707. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119174844.

Ng, H.H. 2010. Notopterus notopterus. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2010: e.T166433A6208173. https://doi.org/10.2305/ IUCN.UK.2010-4.RLTS.T166433A6208173.en.

Pethiyagoda, R. 2013. Haludaria, a replacement generic name for Dravidia (Teleostei: Cyprinidae), Zootaxa, 3646(2): 199. https://doi. org/10.11646/zootaxa.3646.2.9. PMid: 26213759.

Pethiyagoda, R., Meegaskumbura, M. and Maduwage, K. 2012. A synopsis of the South Asian fishes referred to Puntius (Pisces: Cyprinidae), Ichthyol. Explor. Freshw., 23(1): 69-95.

Raghavan, R., Philip, S., Ali, A. and Dahanukar, N. 2013. Sahyadria, a new genus of barbs (Teleostei: Cyprinidae) from Western Ghats of India, Journal of Threatened Taxa, 5(15): 4932-4938. https://doi.org/10.11609/JoTT.o3673.4932-8.

Roberts, C.D. 1993. Comparative morphology of spined scales and their phylogenetic significance in the Teleostei, Bull. Mar. Sci., 52: 60-113.

Sodsuk, P. K. and Sodsuk, S. 2000. Genetic diversity of featherbacks in Thailand. Kasetsart J. (Nat. Sci.), 34: 227-239. Talwar, P.K. and Jhingran, A.G. 1991. Inland Fishes of India and Adjacent Countries (Vols. I & II). Oxford & IBH Publishing Co. Pvt. Ltd, New Delhi; p. 1158.

Tandon, K.K. and Johal, M.S. 1993. Characteristics of larval mark and origin of radii, Curr. Sci., 64(7): 524-525.

Tandon, K.K. and Johal, M.S. 1994. Scales - A tool in fish biology. In: Singh, H.R. (ed.), Advances in Fish Biology. Hindustan Publishing Corporation, Delhi, India: 1-11.

Voronina, E.P., Sideleva, V.G. and Hughes, D.R. 2019. Lateral line system of flatfishes (Pleuronectiformes): Diversity and taxonomic distribution of its characters, Acta Zoologica, 2019:00: 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1111/azo.12311.